Signal Integrity Tools and Design Methodology in the Modern Age


Reading time ( words)

The PCB design process has traditionally been done in silos. One group creates the design intent (schematic), another group implements the logic on the PCB, and yet another group does some checking of the design using analysis tools. This traditional approach has run into a number of problems.

The first problem was that prototypes were showing up in the lab that did not work due to complicated signal and power integrity problems not found by the analysis tools. But even when the analysis team equipped themselves with sophisticated analysis tools, the back-and-forth between silos or lack of time in the schedule tended to create chaos as design deadlines loomed.

Today, modern PCB design methodology offers a more team-oriented solution. With a front-to-back constraint driven approach that enables all groups to get involved with signal and power integrity, many potential problems are either avoided or found early in the design process. With first order problems removed, the analysis team, with their sophisticated tools, is better positioned to focus on design sign-off so prototypes come back working the first time.

This article is focused on how each part of that design team can get out of their silo and work cooperatively. Using a common constraint manager, each group can utilize their varying levels of expertise to ferret out signal and power integrity problems.

Pre-Layout

For teams seeking to break out of their historic silos, tools can help by providing a certain amount of integration. One way that can happen is by having a constraint system integrated with your SI system at all stages of your design process. While decisions are being made for physical partitioning, component/IP selections, and power requirements, pre-layout analysis can help define your solution space and corresponding electrical constraints. This early analysis as part of a well-executed constraint driven flow saves time and prevents issues from propagating down to SI signoff.

Topology analysis is usually what comes to mind when thinking of pre-layout analysis and is an ideal environment for what-if analysis. Here you can start from scratch or by extracting nets from design data in the schematic or layout. In either case you can quickly build a representation of the major interfaces in the design. Models for active devices should be as accurate as possible and interconnect can be estimated or parameterized and swept.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the July 2016 issue of The PCB Design Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

EMA: Cadence Moves Simulation Further Up in the Design Cycle

03/15/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
Cadence Design Systems recently integrated more of its Sigrity capabilities into the front end of its PCB design tools. During DesignCon, Chris Banton of EMA Design Automation spoke with me about how this drive for “model-less analysis” benefits the PCB designer who can now access signal and power integrity, DFM, and electrical rule checking functionality early in the design process and have fewer issues later.

Words of Advice: What are Your Biggest Design Challenges?

03/11/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
In a recent survey, we asked the following question: What are your biggest design challenges? Here are just a few of the answers, edited slightly for clarity.

Todd Westerhoff Discusses His New Position and Much More

03/07/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
At DesignCon, I met with our old friend Todd Westerhoff, a veteran signal integrity engineer. Todd joined Mentor, a Siemens Business, since we last spoke. We discussed his new job responsibilities, his drive to get more designers and engineers to use SI tools, and the increasing value of cost-reduced design techniques versus overdesigning PCBs.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.