Simultaneously Switching Noise: An Overview


Reading time ( words)

This is the first post in a three part series that will examine the problem of SSN and explore methods of reducing SSN in your designs.

Digital designers have become accustomed to signal noise coming in from all directions. With the data rates running on the faster parallel busses, designers will now also need to be concerned about the noise coming out from the chip itself. One such kind of noise, Simultaneously Switching Noise (SSN), occurs due to the Simultaneously Switching Output (SSO) of buffers on a driving chip.

What causes SSN?

When a driven signal inside the chip transitions states, it consumes power from the rail. If a sufficient number of signals switch simultaneously, the rail might droop due to an inadequate access to immediately-required charge to provide current for all the switching outputs. This could happen because the capacitors from the Power Distribution Network (PDN), which are providing the charge, are too far away, or because those capacitors have been laid out in a way which causes them to have a high series inductance.

Subsequently, this droop in rail voltage causes the drivers to not drive clean signals. This is similar to crosstalk-induced noise in that the switching of one signal can cause variations in the output of another signal.

Accurately simulating the current draw of one driven signal on the voltage rail and the subsequent effect on other drivers requires information regarding the buffers’ behavior. One option would be to use Spice models. Alternatively, IBIS allows simulations which are much faster than Spice at a comparable level of accuracy, and is therefore a popular standard for simulation. IBIS 5.0 supports the data structures needed to simulate this “power-aware” topology.

nitin-0602.jpg

SSN is particularly relevant to high-speed parallel busses such as DDR4. With parallel busses, each bit can act independently of the others. This can cause greater loads on the power rails when the signals all switch in unison, creating a greater load on the rail.

In the second installment of this blog series, we’ll take a look at the effects of a poorly designed PDN on SSN and signal integrity. In the meantime, if you’d like to learn more about SSN and similar challenges, check out our white paper “DDR4 Board Design and Signal Integrity Challenges,” which was recently nominated for the DesignCon Best Paper Award.

Share




Suggested Items

Rambus Driving a CXL Memory Option

06/30/2022 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
In this interview with Arjun Bangre, director of product for high-speed interface IPs for PCI Express and CXL at Rambus, the discussion revolves around new developments in CXL, PCI Express, and interoperable IP solutions that Rambus has developed.

Pulsonix Collision Avoidance to Bring Mechanical Capabilities Into ECAD

05/19/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
The I-Connect Editorial Team recently spoke with Bob Williams, managing director of Pulsonix. He discussed some of the new features in the upcoming version of the Pulsonix PCB design tool, Version 12, including collision avoidance and other 3D options that allow certain MCAD functions within the ECAD environment.

A Textbook Look: Signal Integrity and Impedance

05/18/2022 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
Believing that I knew a bit about signal integrity and controlled impedance, I was pleased to take the opportunity to connect with an educational webinar that I hoped would extend my knowledge. In the event I was surprised at how little I actually knew, and the webinar was an excellent learning opportunity. The webinar was introduced and expertly moderated by Anna Brockman of Phoenix Contact in Germany.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.