Alex Stepinski: A Philosophical View


Reading time ( words)

Alex Stepinski gives his thoughts on how test and inspection should be linked and reflects on how the process controls in fabrication are likely to change in the future. 

Barry Matties: Alex, as you know, there are two levels of test inspection: product and process. What is your philosophy around test and inspection? I think you have approached it differently.

Alex Stepinski: The industry traditionally has relied on time zero testing. Defects that are 100% there, not latent defects; this is where things started in our industry. As time went on, methods were developed for latent defects. For instance, IBM originally started decades ago doing CAF testing, shorts testing in chambers. They simulated reflow testing in chambers. As a big OEM, this drove reliability to their products.

Gradually, these philosophies spread through the industry and more methods have been developed. Now, we do this OM test method on IPC D coupons for via reliability. The CAF method hasn’t improved too much. It’s slow and steady, but it’s much more prevalent. But time zero is still what most people do. You generally do reliability through regression. It’s not direct measurement, so there’s a lot of inferences that need to be made; with the time zero work, you have a probe tester and a fixture tester. It runs against your parameters, whatever they are—whether they’re some advanced military parameters, IPC standard parameters, or something special.

This is what people do. My philosophy is to rely less on this and more on sensors throughout the process to measure things non-destructively, then build a model for how you’re going to perform, and just validate against the model. It’s the next step slowly happening worldwide. For instance, we’ve had 2D AOI for many years. Sometimes, this is complemented with electrical tests. Now, you start to see more 3D AOI happening. You see them putting more sensors on the AOI equipment for direct measurement. Then, you also have the traditional signal integrity testing. The challenge with that is it’s never been fully industrialized with automation. There are some tools in the market, but you don’t see them spread everywhere.

It comes down to whether it’s much better to do quick microscopy, or to use a 3D back drilling technology that will sense the location of the plane layers internally.

If you take these methods and integrate them with serialization using QR codes and things like that, you can map a whole panel and find out how thick your prepreg and your cores are, and know the width and height of the features. It’s all about taking this information, throwing it into a data lake like they do in many other industries, then running your analytics, forecasting, predicting what will happen, and doing some spot validation.

It’s the next phase in the market. Digital transformation is a very common topic in many industries, but not so much in PCB. There’s a lot of other sensors out there as well. There are gravimetric techniques that can be used. We hardly use any gravimetric tools to do process control. There are imaging methods to look at roughness on the surface, to make sure things are clean. These things have all been developed for other industries, and you see us just starting to incorporate them.

Matties: Who drives this in the organization? It’s not going to be the quality manager, and it’s probably not a skill set that already exists inside a fabricator. You’re special in that you went out to create something new, fresh, and innovative, whereas everybody else is in a business cycle, if you will. How do they exchange that mentality, and what do they need to do?

Stepinski: From my perspective, this is generally a low-margin business and that’s a fundamental challenge. R&D is expensive, and there always needs to be some dedicated R&D resources to evaluate these technologies. There is some R&D overseas; one of the biggest PCB shops with R&D is AT&S, with a large organization based in Austria.

To read this entire conversation, which appeared in the November 2021 issue of PCB007 Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

Industry Innovation Starts Here

12/09/2022 | IPC Staff
If it isn’t clear already, your money, time, and effort will be well spent attending IPC APEX EXPO in January. Here, we’ve outlined the top six reasons that this event will be the highlight of your year. We’ve done all we can to make the event not only memorable, but a show that allows you to connect with industry peers, learn how to enhance your skills, help advance the industry, and discover new insights on products and strategies from industry innovators.

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

12/09/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
We’re into December, and the new year is around the corner. Things are looking pretty good for our industry. Trade show attendance is back up to pre-COVID levels, and a lot of companies are having banner years. Has the virtual trade show gone the way of the dodo bird? Let’s hope! This week, our must-reads include articles and news items on the decline of R&D, STEM education for kids, why vias do not heat up, the need for more DFT, and the lack of movement toward intelligent data transfer. Designers just love their Gerbers, but Dana Korf has a few ideas about how to make Gerbers obsolete.

The Growing Need for UHDI

11/30/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Jan Pedersen of NCAB Group is deeply involved in IPC standards development surrounding ultra HDI and keeps his finger on the pulse of the industry surrounding this type of fabrication. With Asia still dominating this area, Jan sees the need for U.S. and European PCB fabricators to make the investment if they want to stay competitive.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007 | IPC Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.