-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueLevel Up Your Design Skills
This month, our contributors discuss the PCB design classes available at IPC APEX EXPO 2024. As they explain, these courses cover everything from the basics of design through avoiding over-constraining high-speed boards, and so much more!
Opportunities and Challenges
In this issue, our expert contributors discuss the many opportunities and challenges in the PCB design community, and what can be done to grow the numbers of PCB designers—and design instructors.
Embedded Design Techniques
Our expert contributors provide the knowledge this month that designers need to be aware of to make intelligent, educated decisions about embedded design. Many design and manufacturing hurdles can trip up designers who are new to this technology.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Bridging the Simulation Tool Divide
April 12, 2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 3 minutes
Todd Westerhoff of Siemens EDA recently spoke with the I-Connect007 Editorial Team about the divide between users of high-powered enterprise simulation tools and those who need a more practical tool for everyday use, and how Siemens is working to bridge the gap. Todd also shared his views on why so many engineers do not use simulation, as well as advice for engineers just getting started with simulation tools.
Andy Shaughnessy: Hi, Todd. This is our simulation issue, and we want to get your thoughts on some of the challenges in this area. What do you see right now? What’s the biggest problem in simulation?
Todd Westerhoff: I think the biggest challenge is that there just aren’t enough people simulating. There are a lot of people who are designing to rules of thumb, manufacturer guidelines, or getting somebody else to run analysis for them—but there aren’t that many simulating themselves. I usually break simulation users into two broad groups: SI experts, who run simulations full time; and everyone else, who run simulations intermittently, if at all. The SI experts have the most advanced requirements and are also the smaller of the two groups.
The general assumption about simulation seems to be that it starts at the top—if we meet the analysis needs of the experts, knowledge and technology will trickle down over time to the broader audience. The problem is that, as an industry, we have too many designs in progress with too few experts to support all that activity. Simulation has two main purposes:
1. Providing a basis for making informed decisions about design trade-offs.
2. Validating a design before manufacture to reduce the risk of prototype spins.
How do we expect the majority of system designers to make decisions and reduce risk if they don’t have data to back up those decisions? Most of the simulation that we need to make design decisions and detect issues during layout doesn’t require expert-level attention to detail—the need is far more pedestrian. We’re not servicing those needs when we focus primarily on the state of the art. SI tools have been around for 30 years now, and we still see the majority of people not simulating, so we need to consider doing something else.
Shaughnessy: Maybe they don’t need a tool that you have to be an experienced signal integrity engineer to operate. Can a regular system designer or layout designer use the simulation tools we have today?
Westerhoff: Depending on the tools you talk about, yes and no. Let’s go back to our classes of users. Experts are looking for advanced tools with state-of-the-art performance and capacity. Ease of use is a consideration but not critical, as experts can make pretty much anything work. They have deep SI knowledge and can improvise analytical methods when the situation calls for it. To your question, the tools used by full-time SI/PI engineers are typically not usable by mainstream designers, because the tools by themselves are not enough. You need an analytical methodology, or workflow, to apply the tools to a design and determine whether the design will work, and that process is typically complicated enough (and manual enough) to preclude use by someone who isn’t performing analysis full-time.
And that’s the rub: if we’re not designing a 112-gigabit serial link or a loaded DDR5 interface, most of the issues we face during design and layout don’t require the kind of accuracy that an expert is looking for. There are a lot of design issues you want to take off the table before you put a lot of effort into modeling and simulation. You can think of it this way: Experts typically simulate at the level of accuracy needed to “sign-off” a design for fabrication, but system designers are often just trying to assess the impact of a tradeoff on design margin. In those cases, a good answer now is preferable to a great answer later. You can think of that as “trade-off” analysis. It’s less accurate, but faster to run and accessible to a wider audience. That’s the kind of analysis that needs to be accessible to regular system or layout designers. We have some of those tools in place today, but the world clearly needs more.
To read this entire interview, which appeared in the April 2021 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
iNEMI Packaging Tech Topic Series: Role of EDA in Advanced Semiconductor Packaging
04/26/2024 | iNEMIAdvanced semiconductor packaging with heterogenous integration has made on-package integration of multiple chips a crucial part of finding alternatives to transistor scaling. Historically, EDA tools for front-end and back-end design have evolved separately; however, design complexity and the increased number of die-to-die or die-to-substrate interconnections has led to the need for EDA tools that can support integration of overall design planning, implementation, and system analysis in a single cockpit.
Cadence, TSMC Collaborate on Wide-Ranging Innovations to Transform System and Semiconductor Design
04/25/2024 | Cadence Design SystemsCadence Design Systems, Inc. and TSMC have extended their longstanding collaboration by announcing a broad range of innovative technology advancements to accelerate design, including developments ranging from 3D-IC and advanced process nodes to design IP and photonics.
Ansys, TSMC Enable a Multiphysics Platform for Optics and Photonics, Addressing Needs of AI, HPC Silicon Systems
04/25/2024 | PRNewswireAnsys announced a collaboration with TSMC on multiphysics software for TSMC's Compact Universal Photonic Engines (COUPE). COUPE is a cutting-edge Silicon Photonics (SiPh) integration system and Co-Packaged Optics platform that mitigates coupling loss while significantly accelerating chip-to-chip and machine-to-machine communication.
Siemens’ Breakthrough Veloce CS Transforms Emulation and Prototyping with Three Novel Products
04/24/2024 | Siemens Digital Industries SoftwareSiemens Digital Industries Software launched the Veloce™ CS hardware-assisted verification and validation system. In a first for the EDA (Electronic Design Automation) industry, Veloce CS incorporates hardware emulation, enterprise prototyping and software prototyping and is built on two highly advanced integrated circuits (ICs) – Siemens’ new, purpose-built Crystal accelerator chip for emulation and the AMD Versal™ Premium VP1902 FPGA adaptive SoC (System-on-a-chip) for enterprise and software prototyping.
Listen Up! The Intricacies of PCB Drilling Detailed in New Podcast Episode
04/25/2024 | I-Connect007In episode 5 of the podcast series, On the Line With: Designing for Reality, Nolan Johnson and Matt Stevenson continue down the manufacturing process, this time focusing on the post-lamination drilling process for PCBs. Matt and Nolan delve into the intricacies of the PCB drilling process, highlighting the importance of hole quality, drill parameters, and design optimization to ensure smooth manufacturing. The conversation covers topics such as drill bit sizes, aspect ratios, vias, challenges in drilling, and ways to enhance efficiency in the drilling department.