Cadence Helping Users to Save Time, Money With Automation


Reading time ( words)

During DesignCon, I spoke with Brad Griffin, the group director for product management for the system analysis group at Cadence Design Systems. We discussed some of the areas where PCB designers can cut costs and how EDA companies can help these designers by automating certain time-consuming tasks. As Brad says, “The ‘A’ in EDA is for automation, right?”

Andy Shaughnessy: Good to see you again, Brad. We were talking a few minutes ago about ways that designers can design for profitability by adding profit and cutting waste during the design cycle. Tell us your thoughts on designing for profitability.

Brad Griffin: When you think about what Cadence can bring to the table for designing for profitability, it’s about being efficient. We are one of the few companies that you can come to and get design tools and analysis tools. Historically, the idea is that you have designed something, throw it over the wall to somebody else, who analyzes it and says you made a bunch of mistakes; then, they throw it back. There’s this iteration back and forth. Maybe you build a prototype and find out it doesn’t work. All of that makes the design cycle get very long, and that’s certainly not the way to profitability. The more you can make that efficient, the more profitable that you’re going to be able to make your product and product line, and, ultimately, the more you’re going to be able to build new products because you’re going to get products out the door.

Our thinking is that we can guide a user toward in-design analysis; while they’re designing a product, they’re thinking about SI and PI. They’re bringing up engines that are the same engines that their expert is going to use to sign off on later, but they’re presented in a way where they don’t have to be an expert. You can do a quick review of your power plane and make sure that you haven’t created too many places where you’re going to lose voltage and not going to be able to deliver power to certain components of the board. If you can quickly review that without having to bring a PI expert in, it’s going to make you a better designer, and it’s going to shrink that design cycle. Anything we can do to help the designer produce a better board before it goes to an SI or a PI expert will reduce that design cycle and improve the overall profitability of the design.

Shaughnessy: We keep hearing that 80% of the cost of manufacturing the board is determined in the design cycle.

To read this entire interview, which appeared in the March 2020 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Just Ask Heidi Barnes: The Exclusive Compilation

01/15/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
We asked for your questions for Keysight Technologies' Heidi Barnes, and you took us up on it! We know you all enjoyed reading these questions and answers, so we’ve compiled all of them into one article for easy reference. We hope you enjoy having another bite at the apple.

TTM’s Approach to Stackup Design: Train the Customer

01/12/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
In this interview with the I-Connect007 Editorial Team, TTM’s Julie Ellis and Richard Dang drill down into stackup design, detailing some of the common stackup challenges that their customers face when designing for both prototype and volume levels, and offering advice to designers or engineers who are struggling with stackup issues. They also discuss why having too many different prepregs in a stackup can be asking for trouble, and how proper stackup design can optimize both the fabrication and assembly processes.

Cutting Respins: Journey to the Single-spin PCB

01/07/2021 | Chris Young, The Goebel Company
PCB design is more than a short sprint to the finish line; it is a journey best suited for the prepared adventurer. According to a study by Lifecycle Insights, the average PCB design project requires 2.9 respins. These respins can cost anywhere from tens of thousands to millions of dollars—each! As an engineer/business owner, I find respins frustrating because I would rather spend my time and money applying scientific principles inventing, improving technology, and solving problems. I am not an advocate for perfectionism, but rather I focus on becoming a better adventurer. Sometimes I get to taste the sweet wine that is a single spin PCB. As fellow adventurers, let’s discuss some topics that influence unnecessary return trips on our PCB design journey: simulation, technical reviews, and interest in PCB design.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.