Siemens and Valor: Two Complementary DFM Technologies


Reading time ( words)

Before IPC APEX EXPO kicked off, I attended a Siemens seminar in San Diego on smart manufacturing for electronics and the integration of technologies from Siemens’ digital industry software and Valor. Afterward, I spoke with Andy Farrington, director of portfolio development for the Americas, about the event, as well as some of the hot topics and solutions that the speakers addressed.

Andy Shaughnessy: Andy, this has been a pretty interesting seminar that focused on smart manufacturing for electronics, among other things. Tell us about it.

Andy Farrington: It was a seminar for the smart factory for electronics, which is a big focus for us. At IPC APEX EXPO 2020, we invited several people to learn and get more knowledge about what we have to offer. It was a whole-day event. Approximately 20 people attended all of the sessions, and we covered a lot of topics—from the engineering kickoff, focused on the industry itself, to trends we see in terms of marketplace challenges. Then, we talked a little more about what we have for solutions to address that from an engineering process standpoint, material management, manufacturing execution, etc. I thought it was good that we got a chance to expose people to that. The last presentation was fantastic, by Computrol’s Farid Anani. It was an outstanding example of what happens when people implement this technology and what kind of value you get from it.

Shaughnessy: It looks like a front-to-back smart manufacturing solution that you have.

Farrington: Yes. We talked about using the digital twin, which is our way of talking about how to have a virtual version of the product. If you can do that, then you can understand it better, and it doesn’t cost as much money to make changes in the virtual world versus doing it in the real world. That can be from creating plant simulation of a factory to doing what-if scenarios and trying different layouts. Our customers get tremendous value from that. Today, we had mixed attendance of people familiar with our product, or it was new to them. There were a lot of good questions during the breaks. It’s always nice to share personal experiences; sometimes, making those connections is more important than the seminar.

Shaughnessy: It seems Valor was a key part of the Mentor merger for Siemens.

Farrington: That was one thing that we talked about this morning: Why did Siemens buy Mentor? There were a lot of reasons, but was with the value of the electronics solutions, in particular, Siemens traditionally focused on the mechanical side of manufacturing. Now, with the integration of the Valor solutions, that gives us a full portfolio to do electronic design all the way through manufacturing. Valor tools integrated into Opcenter Execution, which provides a complete solution all the way through to box build.

Shaughnessy: The discussion about addressing the gap between the ERP system and the shop floor where the people are sometimes the weakest link was interesting.

Farrington: Sometimes. That whole integration of the ERP is becoming more important to customers. It’s a way for them to see fast cost savings. It’s always surprising when I visit customers’ sites that haven’t implemented our tools, yet I can see all the material on the shop floor. There’s all this cost sitting on the shop floor. If you can find a way to reduce the amount of material on the shop floor, keep it in inventory, and delivery as needed. All ERP can do for you is tell you it’s in the warehouse; it can’t tell you whether it’s on the line or in a kitting station. I’ve seen operators on the shop floor work over a line, steal a reel off the line, and move it over to theirs. They have no traceability at all.

Shaughnessy: Everybody talks about the smart factory and is all for it, but when we talk to fabricators and assemblers in America, many say they don’t know how to do it. Do you see resistance? Are they curious about the smart factory?

Farrington: There are always situations where people are resistant to change if they use a solution now that they believe works well. If they give us an opportunity to look at their factory and do an assessment, we can find areas where they can make improvements, and that’s what they want to hear. Sometimes, a smart factory approach is a little overwhelming to them because it feels like they have to change everything. We can get them there. Farid talked about his journey at Computrol. He started it in 2007, and you can’t solve it immediately; you have to focus on the long term.

I see companies that are interested in the smart factory, but they want a return on investment relatively fast. That’s why we try to lead them down this path of having a conversation on material management because we think you can get the biggest bang for your buck, and we can show some quick ROI, which is what management wants to see.

Shaughnessy: In some of these places, it’s better to start from scratch than to try to retrofit.

Farrington: We have a few places that are bringing brand new and lines in, and that’s definitely easier.

Shaughnessy: Thanks for having me here today, Andy.

Farrington: No problem. Thank you.

Editor’s note: Download your free copy of Siemens’ book, The Printed Circuit Assembler's Guide to… Advanced Manufacturing in the Digital Age, and view other educational titles in our full library.

 

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Implementing Digital Twin Best Practices From Design Through Manufacturing Webinar Review

01/27/2021 | Dana Korf, Korf Consultancy
I-007e recently released a highly informative series of short webinars called Implementing Digital Twin Best Practices from Design Through Manufacturing presented by industry expert Jay Gorajia, the Director of Siemens Global Digital Manufacturing Services. The webinar is an excellent overview how data that is generated using a digital twin model can be effectively utilized to improve business execution using the Siemens tool suite.

Book Excerpt: The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to Smart Data, Chapter 1

12/30/2020 | Sagi Reuven and Zac Elliott, Siemens Digital Industries Software
Accurate data is required to adjust processes and to ensure quality over time. This is difficult because not all data is in the same format, and not all sensors perform the same over time. How do you know what the best data to collect is and how to filter out the junk data from useful or smart data? This is not an easy task when the interfaces to data collection sources are complex, and they do not speak the same language, often requiring the vendor’s help to get data out of the machine and then spending time normalizing the data to turn it into something useful. This is a challenge for companies trying to set up a custom data collection system themselves.

Book Excerpt: The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to Smart Data

12/16/2020 | Sagi Reuven and Zac Elliott, Siemens Digital Industries Software
Whenever we discuss data, keep in mind that people have been collecting data, verifying it, and translating it into reports for a long time. And if data is collected and processes are changed automatically, people still will be interpreting and verifying the accuracy of the data, creating reports, making recommendations, solving problems, tweaking, improving, and innovating. Whatever data collection system is used, any effort to digitalize needs to engage and empower the production team at the factory. Their role is to attend to the manufacturing process but also to act as the front line of communications and control.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.