Sensible Design: Protecting PCBs from Harsh, Challenging Environments


Reading time ( words)

Last month, I began my new series of columns on resins by selecting five frequently asked questions from our customers regarding resin chemistries and properties, and typical resin applications and their limitations. This month, I’m taking this introduction a step further by listing what I believe are the top five tips for circuit designers and manufacturers who seek to ensure that the reliability and longevity of their electronic assemblies and products are fully addressed.

1. Think very carefully about the sort of environment your PCB is likely to encounter. It is easy to over-engineer a product so that it will survive the very worst of conditions, but worst conditions may only be fleeting or transient. Therefore, a resin solution with a lower temperature performance specification will often cope. Take temperature extremes, for example. Your application may experience occasional temperature spikes of up to 180°C, which you might feel deserves treatment with a special resin. However, such excursions may only be short-lived; under normal operating conditions, the PCB might only be subjected to a maximum temperature of, say, 120°C, opening a wider choice of resin types and methods of application.

In a similar way, the required chemical resistance of your chosen resin will depend on the duration and/or extent of the chemical contamination. For example, there is a considerable difference in terms of the extent of chemical damage between a thin layer of a contaminating chemical on the resin surface that is wiped off within five minutes and 500ml of chemical present on the resin surface for one hour or more—let alone complete immersion! Furthermore, the range of chemicals that a PCB might eventually be exposed to is often quite limited, and almost certainly not the broad range that is frequently listed at the design stage, just to be on the safe side.

2. Environmental factors that normally affect a PCB are temperature, chemical attack, physical shock (vibration) and thermal shock; the trick is to decide which of these is likely to have the greatest impact upon your PCB and then concentrate on making an appropriate resin choice. Each of the three main resin types (epoxy, polyurethane and silicone) have strengths and weaknesses.

Silicone resins have the broadest continuous operating temperature range of any of the resin chemistries, so they are a natural choice for both high- and low-temperature applications, as well as those subject to thermal shock. They also maintain their flexibility over this temperature range with very little sign of degradation over time. On the downside, silicones have poor adhesion on certain substrates and their chemical resistance is not as good as that provided by an epoxy resin.

To read this entire column, which appeared in the May 2018 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Avishtech: A New Player in the Field Solver and PCB Simulation Tools Market

08/13/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
It has been a crazy year with lots of ups and downs. But within the clouds, we’ve seen plenty of silver linings, too. Case in point: Avishtech, a brand-new company lead by founder and CEO Keshav Amla. (You may be familiar with his father, Tarun Amla, a veteran PCB materials technologist who is now with ITEQ.) We recently caught up with Keshav and asked him to discuss his company’s simulation tools, his plans for the company, and what it’s like launching a company in this “new normal.”

App Notes: What Are They Good For?

06/30/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
There are several schools of thought regarding IC manufacturers’ app notes. We wanted to find out more about this, so we spoke with Geof Lipman, director of operations for part data at Octopart.com, a component data platform acquired by Altium in 2015. Geof shared his thoughts on app notes, datasheets, and the need for due diligence when utilizing any unfamiliar data.

This Month in Design007 Magazine: Al Neves on Designing for Profitability

03/11/2020 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
If your company is having trouble designing PCBs for profitability, where does the blame fall? Is it management’s fault for having inefficient processes, or is it the fault of the designers and design engineers for not keeping up to date with their training? During DesignCon, I asked Al Neves of Wild River Technology to weigh in on this question. As he explains, you and your manager might both be to blame for inefficiencies in the design process.



Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.