Exciting New Technology: Thermal Risk Management


Reading time ( words)

Two years ago I entered into a collaboration with Dr. Johannes Adam, from Leimen Germany. Johannes has written a software simulation tool called Thermal Risk Management (TRM). We used it to look at the thermal characteristics of PCB traces under a variety of conditions, and it is hard for me to contain my excitement and enthusiasm for what it does and what we learned about traces using it. Our collaboration resulted in the publication of numerous articles and a book. In this article, I’ll talk about some of the capabilities of TRM that really caught my attention. (Note: TRM has much more power than I will have space to discuss in this article. See the technical note at the end of the article for more on this.)

TRM allows us to model a PCB trace and predict its thermal properties. So the first thing we did was model a variety of traces and compare the results with the data in IPC-2152. The data fit very well, giving us confidence that the process was valid. But if the software could fit a single trace in isolation, then it could also predict the temperature of a trace under a variety of other conditions that board designers more typically face, such as changes in length, the proximity of adjacent traces, and the presence of planes. For example, Figure 1 illustrates the thermal patterns around a trace with and without a plane directly under the trace. The presence of a plane clearly lowers the trace temperature and widens the area of the board where the thermal profile spreads.

But TRM also allows us to view things in many other dimensions. For example, Figure 2 shows the thermal profile of a cross-sectional view of the board underneath the trace. The thermal profile underneath the trace through the board without the plane extends all the way to the far side, but the thermal profile of the board with the plane changes dramatically at the plane. I know of no other way to look at this profile other than with a computer simulation.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the February 2017 issue of The PCB Design Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Words of Advice: Drawbacks to Your PCB Data Format?

08/15/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
In a recent survey, we asked the following question: What is the biggest drawback to your current PCB data format? Here are a few of the answers, edited slightly for clarity.

IPC Reliability Forum Wrap-up With Brook Sandy-Smith

08/12/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
I attended the recent IPC High-Reliability Forum and Microvia Summit in Baltimore, Maryland. The speakers and panelists focused on a variety of topics, but one issue that kept popping up was the failure of some microvias on military and aerospace PCBs. Fortunately, some smart technologists are focusing on determining the cause of these via failures. I asked Brook Sandy-Smith, IPC’s technical education program manager, to give us a quick wrap-up of this event.

Denny Fritz: The Difference Between Quality and Reliability

08/06/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
I recently spoke with industry veteran (and I-Connect007 columnist) Denny Fritz about the relationship between quality and reliability—two terms that are unequal but often used interchangeably. We also discuss the current state of lead-free solders in the U.S. military and defense market as well as the microvia reliability issues Denny focused on at IPC’s High-Reliability Forum and Microvia Summit in Baltimore, Maryland.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.