-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueLevel Up Your Design Skills
This month, our contributors discuss the PCB design classes available at IPC APEX EXPO 2024. As they explain, these courses cover everything from the basics of design through avoiding over-constraining high-speed boards, and so much more!
Opportunities and Challenges
In this issue, our expert contributors discuss the many opportunities and challenges in the PCB design community, and what can be done to grow the numbers of PCB designers—and design instructors.
Embedded Design Techniques
Our expert contributors provide the knowledge this month that designers need to be aware of to make intelligent, educated decisions about embedded design. Many design and manufacturing hurdles can trip up designers who are new to this technology.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute
I3: Incident, Instantaneous, Impedance
In my December 2013 column, I discussed “rooting out the root cause” and how sometimes, the real root cause is hidden when digging for the solution to a problem. In that column, I described how sometimes in an attempt to better correlate measured impedance with modelled impedance, fabricators were tempted to “goal seek” the dielectric constant to reduce the gap between predicted and measured impedance.
To cite a common English saying, “There is an elephant in the room,” (i.e., something else that is contributing to the error that should be obvious but has perhaps been overlooked). And why is that?
Well, maybe the elephant has been in the room for a while, but it started young and has now grown to a size that cannot be ignored. What is that elephant I am referring to, you ask? DC and AC resistance of the trace is a good possible candidate for an answer here, something that started very small and has grown gradually and perhaps imperceptibly, until now it is often too big to ignore.
R is the resistance per unit length, a combination of the DC and AC resistance, and the G is the conductance per unit length. Unlike the L and C, unfortunately, the R and G cannot be seen as dimensionless and the R piles up along the trace whilst the G stays close to 0 and the two do not divide out. This means that the TDR trace shows the effect of trace resistance presenting an upward slope as ohm upon ohm of combined DC and AC resistance “pile up” on top of the instantaneous impedance.
Without this knowledge, someone trying to analyze why the measured impedance is somewhat higher than the prediction may seek the source of error. The dimensions are hard to argue with if there is access to precision microsections, especially if three or four sections are taken along the trace and all correlate. So, it may be deduced that, given the dimensions are known and provided the impedance measurement system is calibrated and air line verified, that the only unknown is the dielectric constant.
To read this column, click here.
More Columns from The Pulse
The Pulse: Drilling Down on DocumentationThe Pulse: New Designer’s (Partial) Guide to Fabrication
The Pulse: Simplest Stackups Specified
The Pulse: Rough Roughness Reasoning
The Pulse: Industry Organizations Keep Knowledge Alive
The Pulse: Instilling an Informal Information Culture
The Pulse: Fitting Physics to Fact
The Pulse: Field Solver Finesse for Modelling Transmission Lines