Dana on Data: Factory 4.0 NPI Compatible Industry Specification Format

IPC APEX EXPO’s emphasis on the Connected Factory Initiative based on CFX and IPC-2581 is underway in a virtual mode this month. The industry is moving down the path of connecting, via bi-directional automation, the data that is input and created during the fabrication and assembly process. This will significantly reduce cycle times and improve quality once it can be automatically analyzed.

One area that has not been addressed is the automation of industry technical specifications from organizations like IPC, ASTM, UL, IEC, etc.

Industry specifications are typically released as a PDF file that is manually reviewed by a front-end engineer. They interpret the requirements, create/update their software, then release this into their engineering system for DFM reviews and for incorporating the requirements into the production traveler or batch card. Companies with properly sized automation programmers will load these into the automation.

Most companies do not have sufficient programming resources. So, the requirements are added into a spreadsheet along with plant design rules and customer specification requirements. This method tends to have higher defect rates because they rely on a human to remember to check and implement the requirements. The manual intervention could be eliminated by providing the technical information in an XML format that is compatible with the intelligent IPC-2581 data format.

Figure 1: Technical specifications have two primary content groupings: guidelines/tutorials, used as a reference; and design/manufacturing requirements.

Specification Functional Content
How much of an industry specification is required to be automated? Technical specifications have two primary content groupings: guidelines/tutorials, used as a reference, and design/manufacturing requirements (Figure 1).

Guidelines and Tutorials

Process Control: Recommended, or sometimes required, equipment settings, process line flow and settings are provided to ensure the stated requirements are achieved. This information is obtained from current manufacturing companies, equipment manufacturers or material suppliers. These requirements are generally incorporated into work instructions vs. product specific travelers.

Tutorials: The information provides background knowledge supporting the reasoning behind the requirements or suggestions on how to apply the requirements. This information can be as short as one line or multiple paragraphs. Tutorials can be incorporated into a company’s training program.

Qualification criteria: These requirements are provided for qualifying the product and manufacturing/inspection process prior to being released for production. These requirements are only applicable for the qualification build and must be tested and certified prior to the product transitioning volume production. This information is not generally automated because it is not used that often and it is easier to manually add it to the travelers.

Design guidelines: This information is intended to be used by the PCB designer to ensure the design complies with the stated requirement. These are generally not “shall” requirements, meaning that they are not required be met, but “should” information in that it may make the design more manufacturable, reliable, or cost effective.

Documentation guidelines: This provides suggested methods on how and where to document the requirements. This typically may indicate which design drawings or in process data collection methods should be used to indicate the requirement or collect data for process control feedback.

Design and Manufacturing Requirements

Acceptability requirements: Information is provided for in-process or final inspection. This is typically provided by text, charts, and graphics. These may be included in the traveler when the requirements are not used on every PCB design. Many of these can be added into the IPC-2581 attributes. These requirements will be included in procedures or work instruction if they are generic in nature.

Inspection methods: Compliance to a specification requirement is often tied to a specified inspection method when different test methods can yield differing results. A good example of this is magnification settings. A lower magnification may not indicate a defect that higher magnification will. This will be added to a traveler as a note in the specific operations where the inspection is performed.

Production tolerances: This is a common specification requirement. These may be physical, such as the board outline length; or electrical, such as impedance tolerances. This information is generally manually added as a fabrication drawing note, referencing the applicable industry standard. Tolerances are already included in the IPC-2581 data definition.

Material Specifications: Material specifications have a table listing of the key technical requirements. These are used by PCB designers, fabricator front-end engineers and incoming material inspectors. This data could easily be converted to an XML format so automated acceptance and design tool loading can occur. For example, many impedance modeler software packages have tables for materials and industry specifications that are manually loaded.

A couple of new companies have combined their resources and knowledge to work with the industry specification companies to create XML based summaries. They will be testing industry acceptance soon. The move to a fully automated bi-directional process will significantly improve design reliability, stability, and cost by reducing the manufacturing variation and risk. The industry is moving in the right direction and we can now focus on automating secondary information transfer that is critical to a successful new product introduction.

Dana Korf is the principal consultant at Korf Consultancy LLC.



Dana on Data: Factory 4.0 NPI Compatible Industry Specification Format


IPC APEX EXPO’s emphasis on the Connected Factory Initiative based on CFX and IPC-2581 is underway in a virtual mode this month. One area that has not been addressed is the automation of industry technical specifications from organizations like IPC, ASTM, UL, IEC, etc.

View Story

Dana on Data: Factory 4.0 NPI Data Transfer Improvements


The recently released IPC Connected Factory Initiative scope is similar to other Factory 4.0 models with the same glaring omission: They all seems to assume that the incoming design data can’t be used as-is and must be reviewed and potentially manually modified prior to manufacturing release.

View Story


Dana on Data: Reducing PCB Specification Interpretation Issues


The PCB industry has accepted a low-quality level of provided documentation from its customers for the past several decades. In this column, Dana Korf reviews one common fabrication print note and asks, “How do you interpret this note?”

View Story

Dana on Data: A Team Method to Reduce Fabricator Engineering Questions


Hundreds of PCB designs are released to be quoted or fabricated every day around the world, and most will have engineering questions or technical queries generated once the data package has been received and analyzed. Dana Korf outlines seven fundamental steps based on Lean/Six Sigma concepts to reduce data transfer issues.

View Story

Dana on Data: How Can the PCB Industry Improve From COVID-19 Responses?


In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the world transformed a very slow medical approval process into the equivalent of a concurrent NPI process by challenging some of the golden rules. Dana Korf shares his thoughts on four areas the PCB industry can re-evaluate and improve.

View Story

Dana on Data: The Importance of PCB Technology Roadmaps


Peter Drucker once said, “Trying to predict the future is like trying to drive down a country road at night with no lights while looking out the back window.” Dana Korf explains how it is critical that PCB fabricator technology roadmaps and capacity planning align with their customers’ product development and volume requirements to ensure that optimum cost, reliability, and performance goals are achieved.

View Story

Dana on Data: Automating DFX Transfer and Analysis Using IPC-2581C


We are inching closer to a world where a complete intelligent PCB data transfer is realized. The IPC 2-16 Digital Product Model Exchange (DPMX) Subcommittee has just sent revision C out for IPC-2581 Consortium review with final industry approval targeted for this June. Dana Korf discusses the significant additions and their impact.

View Story

Dana on Data: Creating IP-protected PCB Design Rules


One of the primary reasons that data packages aren’t compatible is the fabricator/assembler does not provide a complete set of design rules out of concern of giving away their intellectual property (IP). Dana Korf explores the design rule development hierarchy as well as what should be included in an IP-protected design rule document.

View Story


Dana on Data: The DFM/Data Transfer Process Is Broken


In a world that is showing great strides toward implementing a Factory 4.0 world, why can’t a design be passed from a designer to the fabricator without errors every time? Dana Korf emphasizes moving the responsibility up in the food chain, examines key design package error categories, and proposes creating a cultural change.

View Story

New Column—Dana on Data: IPC-2581 Intelligent Bi-directional Data Flow


The IPC Consortium is nearing completion of transferring notes on drawings and working with IPC on converting key IPC specifications into attributes that can be automatically loaded into CAD and CAM systems. This format is extendable to created automated company-specific acceptance files that can be automatically loaded into the CEM’s or fabricator’s engineering systems. IPC-2581 data format is being widely used globally and now needs to become the standard to reduce NPI cycle times by associating critical design information automatically to the physical features.

View Story
Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.