The Shaughnessy Report: Are You Drowning in Data?


Reading time ( words)

Data management was so much simpler during the days of Mylar and Bishop Graphics tape. Data was handwritten. All you had to do was keep track of your paperwork and you were golden.

Now, you’re all much more productive, but you have data coming out of your ears; slowly but surely, incrementally, data has become much more complicated. Design teams grapple with schematic symbols, CAD components, footprints, BOM, netlists, simulation models, 3D models, and user-generated and third-party tool-generated data. Not to mention files for Gerbers, ODB++, or IPC-2581, all the way through final data handoff to CAM.

And still, more than 30 years after the advent of EDA tools, not much has changed. How do designers and engineers wind up managing all of this data? With kluged-together processes and software tools, and the occasional handwritten notes.

It all sounds like a headache waiting to happen. 

We recently surveyed subscribers about their data and data management processes, and many of you reported that keeping data organized is a constant challenge. Gerber is still far and away the No. 1, but over half of respondents used ODB++, meaning that many of your output both sets of files. IDF, AutoCAD and STEP are also popular.

Designers want to hear feedback from their fabricators, assembly partners, customers, and electrical engineers. Among the “other” answers, popular responses were feedback from QC and EDA tool vendors.

When asked about the biggest challenges they faced involving data, respondents ranked accuracy of data No. 1, followed by data management and timeliness of data. Among some of the “other” answers were “verification of data provided to vendors” and “going through all the steps to make sure ODB files generate correctly and completely.”

We also found that about a third of respondents don’t use any statistical data, but almost half of respondents said they used limited stat data, and 7% would like to use statistical data, but have no idea where to begin.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the November 2015 issue of The PCB Design Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Turning ‘Garbage In, Garbage Out' into ‘Good In, Good Out’

03/23/2021 | Tamara Jovanovic, Happiest Baby
In the PCB design cycle, it is so easy to unintentionally introduce “garbage” into your system. Unless you have time to extensively check everything you bring in from an external source, it is very likely that something will not match up with your design data. In the end, this means you’ll have to put more work into your design and basically reverse-engineer a part that was supposed to save you time and effort.

Karen McConnell: Recipient of the IPC Raymond E. Pritchard Hall of Fame Award

03/11/2021 | Patty Goldman, I-Connect007
"I heard about IPC when I started a new job at UNISYS after graduating college. I moved from ASIC design to printed circuit boards," said Karen McConnell after being inducted into the Raymond E. Pritchard Hall of Fame. "At the time, in the late ’80s and early ’90s, there were rumors going around that printed circuit boards were going to disappear, and ASICs were going to take over the world. But something in printed circuit boards fascinated me. I minored in robotics in college as an electrical engineer and the data used to fabricate, assemble and test the boards is actually all robotic language. I was hooked."

The Key to Eliminating Bad Design Data: Constant Vigilance

03/09/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
The I-Connect007 editorial team recently met with Jen Kolar and Mark Thompson of Monsoon Solutions to discuss ways to eliminate bad data from the design process, whether that be from CAD libraries, parts vendors, chip makers, or customers themselves. They key in on some problems and obstacles that allow incorrect data into the design cycle, and then highlight possible solutions.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.