Letter to the Editor: Rick Hartley Offers Addendum on App Notes


Reading time ( words)

In the June 2020 issue of Design007 Magazine, the I-Connect007 editorial team interviewed design instructors Rick Hartley and Dan Beeker regarding their belief that designers should not trust app notes until they've been proven to be accurate. After the issue was published this week, Rick emailed us with a few more points that he wished to contribute to the ongoing app note conversation.

Hi Andy,

After reading the June issue of Design007 Magazine on app notes, I realized there is one key point that I have not pushed hard enough. My real heartburn, and Lee Ritchey’s and Dan Beeker’s for that matter, is that app notes are mostly insufficient in the area of PCB design guidance—not in the area of circuit design assistance and advice. 

Back in the days when PCB design was “Who cares?” app engineers were the circuit design engineer’s best friend. But in these days where PCB design really matters, they frequently fall on their face, since colleges teach nothing about PCB design for SI and EMC.

This really came home to me when I read the interview with Geof Lipman. Barry Matties stated to Geof, “We see some of the industry’s top design instructors telling their classes, ‘Don’t trust app notes. Assume they are wrong until proven right.’” Geof reacted, “They might have been being dramatic. I’m not sure.” 

I can tell you with absolute clarity that neither Lee, Dan, nor I are being dramatic. The problem is that the information that Geof gleans from app notes is much different than the info PCB designers take from them. Simply put, app engineers do not understand how PCBs work. They think they do, but they do not!

There are, however, a couple of exceptions to the premise that most of the problems with app notes have to do with PCB layout. One of these is something that Dan Beeker pointed out in the interview: the fact that many app engineers seem to be in love with the idea of putting ferrites on the power pins of digital ICs. That’s one of Lee’s pet peeves also. He even discusses this in the second volume of his book Right the First Time.

Thanks for allowing me to clarify.

Rick Hartley
RHartley Enterprises

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Why We Simulate

04/29/2021 | Bill Hargin, Z-zero
When Bill Hargin was cutting his teeth in high-speed PCB design some 25 years ago, speeds were slow, layer counts were low, dielectric constants and loss tangents were high, design margins were wide, copper roughness didn’t matter, and glass-weave styles didn’t matter. Dielectrics were called “FR-4” and their properties didn’t matter much. A fast PCI bus operated at just 66 MHz. Times have certainly changed.

Bridging the Simulation Tool Divide

04/12/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Todd Westerhoff of Siemens EDA recently spoke with the I-Connect007 Editorial Team about the divide between users of high-powered enterprise simulation tools and those who need a more practical tool for everyday use, and how Siemens is working to bridge the gap. Todd also shared his views on why so many engineers do not use simulation, as well as advice for engineers just getting started with simulation tools.

Barry Olney’s High-Speed Simulation Primer

04/09/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
The I-Connect007 editorial team recently spoke with Barry Olney of iCD about simulation. Barry, a columnist for Design007 Magazine, explains why simulation tools can have such a steep learning curve, and why many design engineers are still not using simulation on complex high-speed designs.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.