Stitching Capacitor: Crosstalk Mitigation for Return Path Discontinuity

Reading time ( words)

This article discusses the impact of stitching capacitors in mitigating signal crosstalk due to return path discontinuity during layer transition on PCB. The investigation was performed with 3DEM simulation using Keysight EMPro.  


In electronic systems, signal transmission exists in a close loop form. The forward current propagates from transmitter to receiver through the signal trace. On the contrary, the return current travels backward from receiver to transmitter through the power or ground plane right underneath the signal trace that serves as the reference or return path. The path of the forward current and return current forms a loop inductance. It is important to route the high-speed signal on a continuous reference plane so that the return current can propagate on the desired path, directly beneath the signal trace.

When the return path is broken due to the switching of reference planes with different potential, e.g., from ground to power or vice versa after layer transition on PCB, the return current might detour and propagate on a longer path, which causes a rise in loop inductance. This might lead to the sharing of a common return path by different signals that pose a high risk of interference among the signals due to higher mutual inductance. This interference results in signal crosstalk. To mitigate the crosstalk due to return path discontinuity (RPD), stitching capacitors are mounted on the PCB to serve as a bridge between the two reference planes of interest on different PCB layers.

Analysis of Signal Crosstalk

To investigate the impact of stitching capacitor in mitigating signal crosstalk due to RPD during layer transition on PCB, three simulation models of 3DEM are constructed. In model 1A (Figure 1), two signal traces with 50 ohm characteristic impedance in single-ended mode on the top PCB layer transition to the bottom layer using vias. Each segment of the signal traces on top and bottom layers is 100 mil long and 5 mil wide. Meanwhile, the diameters of the via barrel and pad are 5 mil and 7 mil respectively. The PCB stackup shown in Figure 2 is applied to this 3D model, where solid planes exist on layer 2 and 3. All the four copper layers are 1.2 mil thick and FR-4 material is used as the PCB substrate.

The two signal traces are 15 mil apart, which is triple the signal trace width for minimum crosstalk due to forward current propagation. A stitching via is placed 20 mil off each signal via, connected to the reference plane on layer 2 and extending to layer 4. However, voids are placed on the layer 3 reference plane to break the electrical connectivity between the planes on layer 2 and 3. This simulates the effect of RPD on signal crosstalk by switching the reference from ground to power or vice versa after the signal layer transition through the via.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the June 2019 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.



Suggested Items

Why We Simulate

04/29/2021 | Bill Hargin, Z-zero
When Bill Hargin was cutting his teeth in high-speed PCB design some 25 years ago, speeds were slow, layer counts were low, dielectric constants and loss tangents were high, design margins were wide, copper roughness didn’t matter, and glass-weave styles didn’t matter. Dielectrics were called “FR-4” and their properties didn’t matter much. A fast PCI bus operated at just 66 MHz. Times have certainly changed.

DFM 101: PCB Materials

04/30/2021 | Anaya Vardya, American Standard Circuits
One of the biggest challenges facing PCB designers is understanding the cost drivers in the PCB manufacturing process. This article is the first in a series that will discuss these cost drivers (from the PCB manufacturer’s perspective) and the design decisions that will impact product reliability.

Eliminating ‘Garbage In, Garbage Out’ With Checks and Balances

03/26/2021 | Nick Barbin, Optimum Design Associates
The proverbial saying “garbage in, garbage out” holds true in the electronic product development world. PCB designers stand squarely in the middle of a busy information intersection flowing with inputs and outputs. Missing or bad information at the beginning of a design project will undoubtedly lead to board re-spins, increased costs, and most importantly, a delayed product release. The same can be said about the PCB designer who doesn’t provide a fully checked and comprehensive data package to the downstream manufacturers, i.e., “throwing it over the fence.”

Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.