Designers Notebook: Flexible and Rigid-Flex Circuit Design Principles, Part 6

Reading time ( words)

The designer is generally under pressure to release the documentation and get the flexible circuit into production. There is, however, a great deal at risk. Setting up for medium-to-high volume manufacturing requires significant physical and monetary resources. To avoid potential heat from management, the designer must insist on prototyping the product and a thorough design review prior to release.

DFM Review Criteria

Comprehensive documentation is vital. The intent is to provide the fabricator with a detailed list and description of the materials specified for the flexible circuit construction, materials stack-up, reinforced/stiffened areas, critical thickness areas, and to specify a solder-compatible surface finish for all component land pattern features. For the more complex multilayer and rigid-flex applications include cross-sectional views. Critical bend or radius locations must be identified with reference dimensions and it will be helpful to furnish separate views showing an installed flex configuration.

The primary references for evaluating the flexible circuit are tooling holes and fiducial targets. Non-plated tooling holes are commonly used for maintaining the position of the circuit during singulation and, when backed with or part of a rigid section, assembly processing. Fiducial features should be furnished in each circuit section or localized termination area to provide an unvarying ‘datum’ reference for more precise component placement. The optimum fiducial is a solid filled 0.25 to 0.5 mm (.010” to .020”) diameter circle. Cover layer material must provide enough clearance to ensure that it does not overlap onto the fiducial target features during the cover layer-to-base circuit lamination process. 

The use of fiducial features is a common technique for:

  • Solder stencil x, y and theta alignment
  • Precise surface mount component placement
  • Reducing the effects of variable material shrinkage conditions
  • Compensation for any random distortions in flexible materials

Assembly documentation will include a bill of material, approved vendor list, component reference designators and any special requirements. Develop clear, detailed drawings and assembly instructions. This document should include component outlines and general locations. The CAD file will furnish precise component X-Y coordinates and orientation data needed for assembly processing. All SMT devices are aligned and placed onto their respective land patterns using the body center as a reference point for placement coordinates. The fiducial targets described above will assist in establishing these exact X-Y coordinates for solder printing, component placement and orientation. With flexibility comes inherent dimensional instability relative to hardboards or solid metal objects. When multiple component mounting sites are separated by excessive distance it is suggested that multiple fiducial features be provided. The use of multiple datum features is a common technique for reducing or eliminating the effects of variable shrinkage or process distortion in flexible materials. Multiple locations will provide a tighter tolerance within each datum zone or termination area while relaxing the need to maintain a tight tolerance of the flexible interface between other termination areas.

Nesting and Palletizing

Flexible circuit units can be furnished in panelized formats. This format will improve both fabrication and assembly process efficiency and maximizing material utilization. Automated handling for in-line assembly processing for flexible circuits furnished with a provisional rigid backing and multilayer rigid-flex circuits requires a somewhat uniform board outline. Conveyor systems on assembly process equipment are adjustable, but they rely on at least two parallel edges and systems may have different requirements as far as maximum and minimum panel size:

  • Simple array format (rows and columns in one direction)
  • Nested array format (maximizing area utilization)
  • Opposing orientation array format (minimizing material waste)

Assembly Process Variations

The components selected—passive and active devices, surface mount and/or pin-in-hole, coarse pitch, fine-pitch, BGA, CSP—will influence the assembly methodologies adopted. The first stage for traditional surface mount assembly is solder paste deposition. Solder paste is commonly applied using precision dispensing systems or stencil printing. Dispensing is ideal for prototype or low-volume assembly because it can be programmed directly from the CAD data to apply solder to the component mounting sites in any pattern and volume (and it does not require additional tooling). For medium- to high-volume assembly, solder stencil printing is the most efficient. In developing the solder paste stencil for surface mount assembly, process engineers will likely utilize the basic land pattern feature geometries furnished in the CAD files developed for flexible circuit fabrication.

Land pattern geometries for a majority of the passive surface mount components are relatively uniform while lead-frame, ball grid array and fine-pitch ball grid array packaged ICs are furnished in a wide number of pitch and contact geometry variations. To ensure solder paste volumes are optimized, the assembly specialist may choose to modify the CAD data to make subtle changes to the land pattern aperture geometry. And depending on the solder alloy composition selected, the engineer may choose to reduce or increase solder paste print volumes at key locations.

Following solder paste deposition and inspection, the unit will shuttle to the assembly system(s) for surface mount component placement and another inspection step to ensure all components are in position. The final step of the surface mount assembly process is reflow soldering. In this process, the circuit assembly is gradually heated to 235°C allowing the solder composition to become liquidus, completing the joining of component terminals to the circuit land patterns.

Although several methodologies are available for mass reflow soldering, forced air/gas convection systems will likely remain the preferred method for electro-mechanical joining surface mount components to flexible and rigid-flex products. Solder attachment of PiH devices, on the other hand, may employ a simple hand soldering process. For higher-volume applications it may be more efficient to utilize selective wave or fountain soldering, programmed laser heated wire soldering or, for ribbon type contact interface, hot bar thermo compression bond processing.

Design guidelines for flexible and rigid flex circuit applications are detailed further in IPC-2223 while workmanship criteria is defined in IPC-6013, Qualification and Performance Specification for Flexible Printed Boards. Always consult with suppliers during the planning phase of the design program. Review and understand the supplier’s design rules, capabilities and limitations. When the supplier is selected, designate a primary contact and establish a review cycle throughout design program.

Vern Solberg is an independent technical consultant based in Saratoga, California, specializing in SMT and microelectronics design and manufacturing technology. To reach Solberg click here.



Suggested Items

PCB Signal Integrity Optimization Using X-ray Metrology

10/16/2017 | Scott Jewler, SILICON VALLEY X-RAY
It happens again. A new backbone router/switch build or a line card upgrade is approaching completion when something goes wrong. The system won’t operate at the targeted data rate. Deadlines are looming and the root cause of the problem is buried somewhere in a big rack of electronic components.

In Deep: The Art and Science of DFM with Gary Ferrari

02/08/2017 | Andy Shaughnessy, PCBDesign007
When the topic of DFM techniques came up, I knew I had to talk with Gary Ferrari of FTG Corp. Gary has been involved with designing and manufacturing PCBs for decades, and he’s the past co-founder and executive director of the IPC Designers Council. I caught up with Gary between Thanksgiving and Christmas, and we conducted the following interview.

True DFM: Taking Control of Your EDA Tool

02/01/2017 | Kelly Dack, CID+
We PCB designers are doing some truly great things with our layout tools. But we must remember that these tools are so powerful that they will sometimes allow us to design things that can’t be manufactured! We must collaborate with our fabricator and assembly brethren and embrace the best DFM practices, or face the consequences downstream.

Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.