The Practical Side of Using EM Solvers

Reading time ( words)

Electromagnetic (EM) solvers based on Maxwell’s equations have proven invaluable in the advancement of digital electronics and wireline communications. Plain and simple, electrical engineers need to know what a circuit or electrical interconnect will do when excited by a dynamic or varying signal. In the signal integrity world, an interconnect that passes a DC connectivity check can completely fail at higher frequencies. In the power integrity world, a power rail that measures the correct DC voltage could easily go into oscillation when a dynamic load is applied. Learning the basic skills to fire up an EM simulator, obtain qualitative answers in minutes, and higher fidelity answers in a few days, can be the difference between sleepless nights of product failures vs. robust designs with wide design margins.

In the beginning and even today, EM simulators are constantly in search of the right balance between accuracy and speed to “mesh” a three-dimensional structure and acquire the right answer. In the search for the ultimate solution to Maxwell’s equations, whether it is in the frequency domain for finite element methods (FEM) or in the time domain for finite difference time domain (FDTD), the user interface often suffers. Setting up ports, boundary conditions, and mesh topology might give the guru user additional flexibility. For most of us, we need automation to reduce the repetitive tasks.


Figure 1: 3D EM simulators like PathWave ADS SIPro and PIPro make it easy to select nets and auto assign ports for fast EM setup and simulation. EM current density results on the right for a DDR4 DIMM board show how the power delivery at 10 kHz comes from the J1 edge connector, but at the higher 10 MHz frequency the power is being delivered by the on-board capacitors.

The good news is the processing speed of modern computers and low-cost memory has made it much easier to maintain significant accuracy while increasing speeds. This has enabled increased investment in optimizing user interfaces for specific applications, like simulating multi-layer laminate PCB designs. The improved user interfaces like Keysight’s PathWave ADS SIPro and PIPro rely on robust importing of EDA PCB CAD data, which include stackup, nets, and components for easy selection of nets and components for simulation. Ports can be automatically assigned, and default meshing and boundary conditions enable users to be up and running with an EM simulation in a matter of minutes.

However, simulators are notorious for “garbage in equals garbage out.” Here are a few tricks of the trade to ensure a proper setup.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the July 2022 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.


Suggested Items

Producing Diverse Designs in Concert With Manufacturing

06/16/2022 | Scott Miller, FreedomCAD Services
There is a new acronym bubbling up in the design world: DWM, which stands for “design with manufacturing.” Why is this different than design for manufacturing, or DFM? With DWM, the emphasis is on integration between the design team and the manufacturers during the design process. DWM is much more than that. We are tasked with producing designs that meet various technical requirements, yet are cost-effective and manufacturable. We provide this service to hundreds of customers who have varying degrees of processes, tools, and manufacturing partners. Given this diversity, we have recognized the importance of designing with manufacturing to achieve the product development goals of manufacturability and technical excellence.

Additive Manufacturing Requires Additive Design Techniques

05/09/2022 | Luca Gautero, SUSS MicroTec
Although I am not a designer by trade, I want to share my thoughts on what additive manufacturing means for designers, especially how it relates to solder mask. In this article, you will learn what topics I feel are the most important to address.

Designing PCBs With Additive Traces

04/28/2022 | Tomas Chester, Chester Electronic Design
Advances in technology have been clear to see within the component packaging industry, as the ball grid array (BGA) package sizes reduce from 1.0 mm pitch to 0.8 mm, 0.4 mm, and even beyond. However, while these improvements have occurred with component packages, it has become increasingly more difficult to break out and route the dense circuitry associated with these parts. Currently, the high-density interconnect (HDI) method typically used for the breakout of such parts has been to create the smallest possible subtractive-etched traces with microvias to allow for connections and escapes on the innerlayers of your PCB.

Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.