Field of Dreams: The Art and Science of Designing with Field Theory

Reading time ( words)

For this issue of Design007 Magazine focusing on the art and science of PCB design, we sought input from Dan Beeker, senior principal engineer of NXP Semiconductors. Dan has spent years teaching designers about the need to focus on the electromagnetic fields around the traces, not the traces themselves, as the late Ralph Morrison advised. We asked Dan to share his thoughts on the art of designing PCBs, and how art and science figure into his views on field theory.

Andy Shaughnessy: We often hear that PCB design is part art and part science, right brain and left brain. Do you think it’s more of one than the other, or does it depend on the design job?

Dan Beeker: I think that the legacy has been more focused on the art side, to make things symmetrical and “pretty.” Now, the science needs to dominate, and those grouped traces need to be separated as much as possible in order to improve signal integrity and reduce crosstalk. The same idea needs to apply to the urge to flood large areas of power conductors to fill in the entire layer. The correct way is to use the vias that connect the power “islands” to the ICs and capacitors, leading to ugly, asymmetrical shapes.

Shaughnessy: Can someone with a great mind for science learn the artistic side of design? That’s one thing that non-degreed designers jokingly say about EEs—that they focus too much on science and not enough on the beauty of the design. What do you think?

Beeker: I am sure that is possible. It is about where you find beauty. I find beauty in visualizing the continuous transmission lines, perfectly controlling the flow of energy, the perspective of symmetry of the two conductors bounding the dielectric. (Yes, I know I am weird.) There is always some beauty resulting from the different colored shapes shown in the layout tools.

Shaughnessy: Does a PCB designer need to have an artistic side to apply the science?

Beeker: I think that one needs to have an abstract side, like Van Gogh or Delaunay—shapes that are defined by their function and connectivity result in the best performance.

Shaughnessy: You’ve been spreading the word about the need for designers and EEs to focus more on fields than on the traces, as many designers were taught. Does this require a designer to have artistic and scientific abilities in order to apply this concept correctly?

Beeker: I believe it goes to trust. It was hard for me to trust the shapes to manage the fields; plumbing connects the sources of energy to the places on the board where it will be used, with enough capacity to do the job. A one-gallon-a-minute hose cannot deliver five gallons a minute. You need a bigger hose or five hoses. The same is true for PCB design.

Shaughnessy: Steve Jobs demanded that the inside of the device look as beautiful as the outside. Are electronics designers and engineers “closet artists” looking for a chance to express themselves?

Beeker: As a goal in itself, that is not always going to yield a good design. Symmetry is a common standard for beauty, and that is rarely present in a good design.  

Shaughnessy: Is there anything else you’d like to add?

Beeker: It’s all about the space, which still seems to be the final frontier. If you are not designing the spaces, with today’s products, the cost is severe. Billions of dollars are spent every year by well-meaning design teams on redesigning PCBs, often with very little hope that the new version will be any better than the first. Ralph Morrison said it best:

“Buildings have walls and halls. People travel in the halls not the walls. Circuits have traces and spaces. Energy and signals travels in the spaces not the traces.”

This conversation originally appeared in the December 2021 issue of Design007 Magazine.


Suggested Items

Altimade Puts Designers and Manufacturers Together

06/24/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
Despite all of the talk about the need for communication between designers and manufacturers, many PCB designers still do not talk with their manufacturers for a variety of reasons. Altium and MacroFab aim to change this dynamic. In this interview, Ted Pawela, chief ecosystem officer of Altium and head of Altium’s Nexar Business Unit, and MacroFab CEO Misha Govshteyn, discuss the new Altimade manufacturing service that Altium is introducing in partnership with MacroFab. Ted and Misha provide an overview of the Altimade process, how it links designers to fabricators, assembly providers, and component distributors, and they explain how it could pave the way for true design with manufacturing, or DWM.

The Survey Said: Why Don’t You Know Your Fabricator?

06/23/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
When we want to find out what challenges our readers are facing, we just ask. And they don’t mind sharing—the good, the bad, and the ugly. In a recent survey, we asked our PCB designer readers, “Why don’t you know who is going to manufacture your boards?” Here are some of more interesting replies we received, edited slightly for clarity. Do you see yourself in these replies?

Producing Diverse Designs in Concert With Manufacturing

06/16/2022 | Scott Miller, FreedomCAD Services
There is a new acronym bubbling up in the design world: DWM, which stands for “design with manufacturing.” Why is this different than design for manufacturing, or DFM? With DWM, the emphasis is on integration between the design team and the manufacturers during the design process. DWM is much more than that. We are tasked with producing designs that meet various technical requirements, yet are cost-effective and manufacturable. We provide this service to hundreds of customers who have varying degrees of processes, tools, and manufacturing partners. Given this diversity, we have recognized the importance of designing with manufacturing to achieve the product development goals of manufacturability and technical excellence.

Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.