Register Now for DownStream Webinar June 23

Reading time ( words)

PCB designs require a predictable and error-free transition from design to manufacturing. Finding errors during the manufacturing cycle leads to production delays and unexpected costs. When analyzing for potential errors before committing a design to fabrication there is more time and are more options to address errors properly. 

• Analyze, identify, and fix manufacturing flaws that may cause delay
• Inspect for etching, soldermask, thermal, and spacing violations
• Verify and maintain design integrity and intent
• Efficiently and effectively drive PCB fabrication

This free webinar exposes how easy it is to use DownStream Technologies’ analysis software, along with software designed to automate a CAM engineering department. Attendees will learn how to increase efficiency and avoid delays. By implementing our solutions, designers will ultimately save time and money.

Date/Time

June 23, 2020

9 AM Eastern Time/6 AM Pacific: Click here to register.

2 PM Eastern Time/11 AM Pacific: Click here to register.  

01/15/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team

We asked for your questions for Keysight Technologies' Heidi Barnes, and you took us up on it! We know you all enjoyed reading these questions and answers, so we’ve compiled all of them into one article for easy reference. We hope you enjoy having another bite at the apple.

01/12/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team

In this interview with the I-Connect007 Editorial Team, TTM’s Julie Ellis and Richard Dang drill down into stackup design, detailing some of the common stackup challenges that their customers face when designing for both prototype and volume levels, and offering advice to designers or engineers who are struggling with stackup issues. They also discuss why having too many different prepregs in a stackup can be asking for trouble, and how proper stackup design can optimize both the fabrication and assembly processes.

01/07/2021 | Chris Young, The Goebel Company

PCB design is more than a short sprint to the finish line; it is a journey best suited for the prepared adventurer. According to a study by Lifecycle Insights, the average PCB design project requires 2.9 respins. These respins can cost anywhere from tens of thousands to millions of dollars—each! As an engineer/business owner, I find respins frustrating because I would rather spend my time and money applying scientific principles inventing, improving technology, and solving problems. I am not an advocate for perfectionism, but rather I focus on becoming a better adventurer. Sometimes I get to taste the sweet wine that is a single spin PCB. As fellow adventurers, let’s discuss some topics that influence unnecessary return trips on our PCB design journey: simulation, technical reviews, and interest in PCB design.