This Month in Design007 Magazine: Design Economics With Kelly Dack


Reading time ( words)

I recently spoke with Kelly Dack—CID, CID+, and a PCB designer and instructor who has worked in the design and manufacturing segments over the years. Thanks to his background, Kelly provides an intriguing viewpoint on cost-aware design and the philosophy of design economics in general.

Andy Shaughnessy: Kelly, you’ve written about cost and profit in PCB design. Give us a basic overview of your thoughts on design economics.

Kelly Dack: Considering cost in design is tricky because there are so many facets of cost. First, it’s expressed in product development as “time-to-market.” How much is a company losing by not having this product? It depends on priorities. I’ve always said that the first priority is meeting a performance specification and then meeting a cost specification. But in this tricky industry, if you miss either constraint—cost or performance—you may not have a product.

And rarely do I see a cost constraint on the front end of a PCB design project. In fact, I just had a conversation with an engineer regarding using a new chip and a new sensor to drive down the cost of a product, which has been on the market for years. Here’s where it gets tricky: You may not necessarily save money by using a less expensive component. Component packages can have many different form factors, and each may require different design techniques, which could offset any cost savings. A proposed new chip may require a more expensive design process, manufacturing process, materials requirement, or all three. It’s never simple. It really requires some good analysis by all of the project stakeholders.

Shaughnessy: Before you begin layout, what are some criteria that you keep in mind for cost-aware design?

Dack: The first thing is to define products by classes. What type of class does the product belong to? Is it a disposable product? Is it a product that has a dedicated use, or is it a product that needs high reliability? These are all different types of product classifications that will play into how much the product should cost.

For instance, a disposable/throwaway calculator that you buy at a dollar store would be presumed to use less costly components, higher volumes, and techniques to reduce the cost so that a profit would be realized by selling the product in volume. However, a spy satellite or a control mechanism in the cockpit of an airplane will most certainly be more costly due to its limited volume of production and it’s higher reliability requirements. The components and parts used in the product have to undergo rigorous testing, which all add cost to the individual components, and that will add cost to the overall product. Then, there are the specifications and regulations that will add to the timeline and cost.

To read this entire interview, which appeared in the April 2020 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Just Ask Heidi Barnes: The Exclusive Compilation

01/15/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
We asked for your questions for Keysight Technologies' Heidi Barnes, and you took us up on it! We know you all enjoyed reading these questions and answers, so we’ve compiled all of them into one article for easy reference. We hope you enjoy having another bite at the apple.

TTM’s Approach to Stackup Design: Train the Customer

01/12/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
In this interview with the I-Connect007 Editorial Team, TTM’s Julie Ellis and Richard Dang drill down into stackup design, detailing some of the common stackup challenges that their customers face when designing for both prototype and volume levels, and offering advice to designers or engineers who are struggling with stackup issues. They also discuss why having too many different prepregs in a stackup can be asking for trouble, and how proper stackup design can optimize both the fabrication and assembly processes.

Cutting Respins: Journey to the Single-spin PCB

01/07/2021 | Chris Young, The Goebel Company
PCB design is more than a short sprint to the finish line; it is a journey best suited for the prepared adventurer. According to a study by Lifecycle Insights, the average PCB design project requires 2.9 respins. These respins can cost anywhere from tens of thousands to millions of dollars—each! As an engineer/business owner, I find respins frustrating because I would rather spend my time and money applying scientific principles inventing, improving technology, and solving problems. I am not an advocate for perfectionism, but rather I focus on becoming a better adventurer. Sometimes I get to taste the sweet wine that is a single spin PCB. As fellow adventurers, let’s discuss some topics that influence unnecessary return trips on our PCB design journey: simulation, technical reviews, and interest in PCB design.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.