The Evolution of PCB Design and Designers


Reading time ( words)

According to Rainer Asfalg of Altium, VP Sales EMEA, EDA companies owe it to their customers to provide much more than just a standard design tool. I met with Rainer at the recent electronica show to discuss the continued evolution of the design process towards automation, and what this might mean for the education and overall requirements of PCB designers going forward.


Barry Matties: Rainer, in our pre-interview discussion, you gave us a little bit of your background and it sounds comprehensive. You bring a lot of insight from multiple disciplines and product types, which gives you a good, diverse foundation to draw from.

Rainer Asfalg: Yes, I think this is important for understanding the markets and understanding customers. It puts me in a position to make the right judgment on what our customers are really asking for and what challenges they face.

Matties: You're also a printed circuit board designer. You have hands-on practical experience. How many years did you design for before you started working for the factories?

Asfalg: Five years. I worked at a service bureau, mainly doing classical digital design, but I also got involved in analog and RF applications.

Matties: That's a broad spectrum. Being in a design bureau gives you a great look at what's going on and a cross-section of current technology. One of the things that we hear about designers is that they don't have a deep understanding of the PCB manufacturing process. From the perspective of a designer, what do you think about that statement?

Asfalg: It’s correct. That’s why an EDA company's responsibility is to put automation in place to ensure quality, while freeing up designers from time otherwise spent on preparing manufacturing data. On top of this, when we look at how the profession has evolved, what actually is a designer today?

Matties: That's a great question. Can you answer that?

Asfalg: These days we deal with a completely different type of designer. In the past we had electrical engineers who captured the design on a piece of paper or, further down the line, were responsible for schematic entry. Then they handed this over to a PCB design department or a service bureau. Those PCB designers are now my age or older. So these classic PCB departments have gradually faded away. The new designers are now responsible for much, much more. It is not simply about capturing the design, rather they are responsible for the test strategy, the PCB design, and the manufacturing as well.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the January 2016 issue of The PCB Design Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

EMA: Cadence Moves Simulation Further Up in the Design Cycle

03/15/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
Cadence Design Systems recently integrated more of its Sigrity capabilities into the front end of its PCB design tools. During DesignCon, Chris Banton of EMA Design Automation spoke with me about how this drive for “model-less analysis” benefits the PCB designer who can now access signal and power integrity, DFM, and electrical rule checking functionality early in the design process and have fewer issues later.

Words of Advice: What are Your Biggest Design Challenges?

03/11/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
In a recent survey, we asked the following question: What are your biggest design challenges? Here are just a few of the answers, edited slightly for clarity.

Todd Westerhoff Discusses His New Position and Much More

03/07/2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
At DesignCon, I met with our old friend Todd Westerhoff, a veteran signal integrity engineer. Todd joined Mentor, a Siemens Business, since we last spoke. We discussed his new job responsibilities, his drive to get more designers and engineers to use SI tools, and the increasing value of cost-reduced design techniques versus overdesigning PCBs.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.